A Webhook.site alternative built to be thrown away

Webhook.site is the more capable tool, and for building an integration against a provider you do not control it is probably the one you want. This is shaped around a narrower idea: that a bin collecting somebody else production traffic is a liability from the moment the first request arrives.

Open the Webhook Inspector →

Webhook.site and Softland, side by side

 Webhook.siteSoftland
Getting a URLInstant, no accountInstant, no account
What you seeMethod, headers, query, raw body, in real timeMethod, headers, query, raw body
Customising the responseStatus, headers and body are configurableFixed
RetentionLonger, and extendableShort by design
Forwarding and replaying requestsSupportedNot offered

A bin is a bucket of other people data

The moment you paste a bin URL into a payment provider, a CRM or an identity service, whatever that system sends starts arriving - and it does not send test data because you are testing. Webhook payloads carry email addresses, names, amounts, addresses, internal identifiers, and frequently a signing header that authenticates the request. All of it lands at a URL anyone who learns it can read.

Short retention is the response to that. The requests are there long enough to read while you are working and gone shortly after, so a bin URL that ends up pasted into a ticket or a chat channel stops being a window onto anything. A tool that keeps them for longer is more useful and more of a problem, and which of those matters more depends entirely on what you pointed at it.

Read the request rather than the documentation

The reason to use a bin at all is that integration documentation is frequently wrong, out of date, or describing a different API version. What actually arrives settles the argument: whether the body is JSON or form-encoded, whether the signature is in a header or a query parameter, what the content type really says, which fields are present when the documentation says they are optional.

That is why the raw body matters more than a parsed view of it. Pretty-printing a payload is convenient and hides exactly the things you are debugging - a trailing newline, a character set mismatch, a body that was double-encoded on the way out. Seeing the bytes as sent is the point.

What a fixed response costs you

Being plain about the gap: this bin answers every request the same way. If you need to see how your integration behaves when the endpoint returns a server error, or a redirect, or a deliberately malformed body, you need a tool that lets you set the response, and Webhook.site does.

Testing the happy path is the common case and a fixed response covers it. Testing the retry logic, the timeout handling and the error branches is the case where a fixed response is useless, and that is a real reason to use something else rather than a feature gap to apologise for.

When Webhook.site is the better choice

  • You need to control the response - a specific status, header or body - to exercise the error and retry paths of the system calling you.
  • You need requests to persist for days while you work through an integration, rather than for the length of a session.
  • You want to forward or replay captured requests to another endpoint.
  • You want a stable, memorable URL configured once in a provider dashboard rather than a fresh one each time.

Frequently asked questions

Do I need an account?
No. Open the page, take the URL, point something at it. The management token that lets you come back to a bin is kept in your browser rather than behind a login.
Can I see the raw request body?
Yes, exactly as it arrived. That is usually the thing you need, because encoding problems and double-encoded payloads disappear the moment a body is prettified.
How long are requests kept?
Not long, deliberately. A bin accumulates real payloads from whatever you pointed at it, so a short life is a safety property rather than a limitation.
Should I send production data to a bin?
Avoid it where you can. Anyone with the URL can read what arrives, and webhook payloads routinely contain personal data and authentication headers. Use test mode in the provider if it has one, and treat the bin URL itself as a secret.

Try it yourself

Get a URL, send it webhooks, see exactly what arrived.

Open the Webhook Inspector

Webhook.site is a trademark of its respective owner. Softland is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by Webhook.site. This comparison reflects how each product works rather than what either costs, because pricing and plan limits change; check Webhook.site’s own site for its current terms.