WebP to JPG Converter

Convert WebP images to JPG so they open in any software. Transparency is flattened onto white, and nothing is uploaded.

Runs entirely in your browser. Nothing is uploaded.

FromWebPSmaller at the same quality
ToJPGPhotos, small files

0 keeps the original size.

Drop WebP files here, or

Converted on this device. Nothing is uploaded.

How to use the WebP to JPG Converter

  1. Drop in your WebP files

    Decoded by your browser directly.

  2. Set the quality

    Around 85% keeps photographs looking identical while staying small.

  3. Download the JPG

    The result opens in effectively any software.

Compatibility is the whole reason

There is no quality or size argument for this conversion - WebP beats JPEG on both. The reason to do it is that you have a .webp file and something in front of you will not open it: an older photo editor, a document template, a print service, a form upload that rejects the extension.

JPG is the most universally readable image format there is. That is what you are converting for.

What you give up

Transparency, entirely. JPEG has no alpha channel, so transparent areas are flattened onto white before encoding. If the WebP was a logo on a transparent background, the JPG will have a white box around it - convert to PNG instead if that matters.

Some file size, and a little detail. The WebP is decoded and re-encoded as JPEG, which is a second lossy pass. At a high quality setting this is not visible, but the JPG will usually still be larger than the WebP it came from.

Frequently asked questions

Why can nothing open my WebP file?
WebP is well supported in browsers and inconsistently supported outside them. Plenty of desktop editors, office suites and print workflows still cannot read it.
What happens to transparency?
It is flattened onto white, because JPEG cannot store an alpha channel. If you need the transparency kept, convert to PNG instead.
Will the JPG be smaller than the WebP?
Usually not. WebP compresses better, so the JPG is often larger. You are converting for compatibility, not for size.
Is any quality lost?
A little, since this is a second lossy encode. At 85% and above it is not visible at normal viewing size.